These numbers have been verified by comparing the official documents of the issuers and on‑chain dashboards: iShares (BlackRock) – IBIT and market analyses published by specialized outlets. It should be noted that the dynamic has been gradual, but now quite clear.
According to data collected by market analysts and the on-chain dashboards I regularly monitor, the migration towards listed vehicles has increased steadily over the past two years.
The analysts on the team track deposit/withdrawal patterns over 30/90/365-day windows and observe that the decrease in on-exchange reserves is consistent with persistent net inflows towards ETFs.
Contextualized, these volumes become significant:
The data aligns with reported reconstructions and the flows indicated in market summaries, which can be consulted along with the official fund reports on ishares.com and the on-chain dashboards.
An interesting aspect is that the counts on 745,000 BTC and 3.6M ETH refer to a specific snapshot and, as always, require comparison with subsequent updates to grasp the evolution of the picture. Update: the observations and trends are confirmed until August 2025 according to the on-chain analyses and market reports consulted.
The growth of spot ETFs is reshaping the asset custody landscape: fewer coins are held in exchange hot wallets and an increasing number of assets are stored in segregated custody with institutional custodians offering audits, insurance, and stringent compliance controls.
In the case of IBIT, the appointed custodian is Coinbase Custody, while other ETFs in the market rely on regulated operators – including Gemini, Fidelity, or BitGo – reinforcing the concept of consolidation of custody in a few specialized hands, thus influencing transparency, operational risk, and governance.
In this context, operational centralization increases efficiency but also introduces new points of attention. For an in-depth look at key terms, see our guide on segregated custody.
That said, a further reading of the flows suggests that the figures of 745,000 BTC and 3.6M ETH are consistent with the idea of persistent institutional demand: fewer assets in exchange hot wallets, more assets in listed vehicles and in segregated custody. It should be noted that market seasonality can affect the pace of inflows, but the underlying trend remains clearly visible.
With a larger share of supply “frozen” in listed vehicles and a reduced availability of assets on the spot order book, the net liquidity tends to decrease.
This can amplify price movements: on one hand, supporting the value during demand phases, while on the other hand, it can accentuate volatility in case of redemptions or market shocks.
In recent weeks, despite recording high quotations, inflows to exchanges have remained limited, configuring a typical pattern of institutional accumulation. In this scenario, even small imbalances can produce more pronounced effects than expected.
Opportunities
Risks
Go to Source
Author: coinmaker
The stablecoin bill could miss its expected April review as banks press Congress to tighten…
Kelp DAO is challenging layerzero‘s account of a $290 million rsETH bridge exploit, arguing the…
KelpDAO reportedly lost nearly $290 million in a major incident tied to layerzero hack concerns.…
Nordic Blockchain Conference returns to Stockholm for its 8th edition, highlighting the future of digital…
The Future of Intelligence Takes Center Stage at New York’s Premier Gathering of Global AI…
As part of efforts to advance decentralized network execution and cross-chain transfers, Phoenix Finance, a…
This website uses cookies.
Read More