The published framework, codified as Revenue Procedure 2025-31, creates a safe harbor allowing eligible ETPs and trusts to stake tokens without losing pass-through tax status. Importantly, the guidance ties tax treatment to clearly defined operational constraints, which should simplify crypto etf taxation for sponsors and auditors.
Specifically, the safe harbor requires a strict single-asset
Under the new standards, assets must be held by qualified custodians that control keys and execute staking per documented procedures. Sponsors must contract with independent staking providers to avoid conflicts of interest, and all relationships must be transparent in prospectuses and filings.
Liquidity is central. The guidance expects funds to meet SEC-style liquidity thresholds and maintain that at least 85% of assets can be redeemed quickly despite some holdings being staked. As a result, product teams will need to model unstaking windows, slashing risk and redemption mechanics when compiling disclosures.
Managers should document custody chains, validator selection criteria and insurance or slashing mitigation agreements. Next, update NAV calculations to reflect reward accruals and fees, and include detailed risk disclosures on liquidity requirements etf documents. Finally, run stress tests to validate that redemptions work while a portion of assets is locked in staking.
Custodians will likely need SOC-type controls, attestation frameworks, and on-chain proof-of-reserve capabilities. Moreover, auditors will expect time-stamped records that link incoming staking rewards to investor tax lots, aligning operational standards with crypto etf taxation norms.
For investors, the guidance makes it feasible to receive staking rewards through regulated accounts without handling private keys. Proof-of-stake blockchains such as Ethereum and Solana typically offer staking yields in the range of 1.8%–7%, though net returns will vary after fees and downtime penalties.
Consequently, more traditional investors may view staking rewards etf products as a yield complement to fixed-income allocations. That said, funds must clearly disclose how rewards are calculated and passed through to retail and institutional holders.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on social media the move provides “a clear path to stake digital assets and share staking rewards with their retail investors,” adding it “increases investor benefits, boosts innovation, and keeps America the global leader in digital asset and blockchain technology.”
Bill Hughes, senior counsel at Consensys, described the change as long-awaited. He said the guidance offers “long-awaited regulatory and tax clarity” and that it “enables [funds] to participate in staking while remaining compliant,” while removing a major legal barrier to integrating staking yield into regulated products.
Patrick Witt, executive director of President Donald Trump’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, praised the decision as deriving from a White House recommendation, and Nate Geraci noted on X: “Just two years ago, we had then SEC Chair Gary Gensler indicating that proof of stake tokens were securities… Today, we have the U.S. Treasury Secretary providing tax clarity on staking in ETFs that now hold those very same tokens. We’ve come so far.” These comments frame the guidance as an important policy milestone.
The IRS and Treasury explicitly referenced the SEC’s September decision that established listing standards for spot crypto ETFs. That prior SEC step opened market access for spot Ethereum and Solana funds but had left staking in a legal gray zone. The new inter-agency alignment now clears a path for staking-enabled products to follow.
Notably, the announcement arrived amid a 40-day government shutdown that had already disrupted normal agency operations. As a result, implementation timelines may vary, and sponsors should anticipate additional review time if agency staffing is constrained.
Analysts expect a wave of staking-enabled trusts and ETFs, but the market may see fragmentation as product sponsors choose different validator strategies and liquidity models. Meanwhile, increased concentration could occur around custodians and staking providers that demonstrate robust compliance and insurance arrangements.
Investors must weigh protocol risk, slashing exposure, and operational counterparty risk. In addition, sponsors should maintain transparent fee schedules and reconcile projected yields with realized distributions, to meet investor expectations and avoid regulatory scrutiny.
Sponsors should update prospectuses, run liquidity stress tests, and document staking custody requirements, validator SLAs, and reward accounting. Investors should evaluate historic validator performance and custodian attestations before allocating to staking ETPs or proof of stake funds.
Overall, Revenue Procedure 2025-31 represents a major step in integrating staking into regulated U.S. markets. While the framework supports broader participation, careful governance, disclosure and operational controls will determine whether staking etfs become a scalable, mainstream product.
Go to Source
Author: NixCoin
Coinbase, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, has named Liz Martin as its new…
Alchemy Pay, the fiat-to-crypto payments gateway, announced on Wednesday that it has entered a partnership…
Cache Wallet, a popular non-custodial crypto wallet provider, has partnered with Zetarium, a BNB Chain-based…
Orexn, a decentralized crypto launch space for Web3 projects, has declared its groundbreaking collaboration with…
Crypto investors are learning that patience pays off. The market may experience daily surges and…
A new study from Bybit has reignited debate. Its Lazarus Security Lab’s report, “Blockchain Freezing…
This website uses cookies.
Read More