Treasury staking rules enable regulated funds to earn staking rewards

The U.S. Treasury clarified policy recently on how licensed managers can collect network income, marking a policy update that reshapes treasury staking rules for regulated funds and their custodians; see the Coinpedia report.

What did the U.S. Treasury approve for staking rewards and regulated crypto funds?

The announcement said the U.S. Treasury will allow certain regulated funds to receive and hold staking rewards, subject to existing compliance and custody frameworks. In this context, the measure was described in the report as a formal recognition of on-chain reward flows, dated 14 May 2023.

As a result, fund managers with appropriate licenses may change operational procedures to process network income. Institutional

custody providers are expected to update contracts and reporting lines accordingly; it should be noted that adjustments will depend on contractual arrangements and licence conditions.

How will regulated funds claim and report staking rewards?

Funds will need documented procedures to claim, segregate and account for staking yields while meeting anti-money‑laundering and custody rules. It should be noted that the underlying source did not set out specific tax treatment or standardised reporting templates, which remain subject to further agency guidance.

One practical implication is that administrators and trustees must reconcile on‑chain receipts with fund ledgers. Meanwhile, auditors will seek clear trails for staking income and distribution mechanics; Institutional managers should prepare tighter controls and transparent record-keeping to satisfy audit and compliance obligations.

Quick definitions

For clarity, the report offered concise definitions of key terms.

• Staking rewards — network-issued income from proof-of-stake activity.
• Regulated fund — a licensed investment vehicle subject to securities rules.
• Custody — third-party safekeeping of digital assets and rewards.

Note: Managers should verify operational and tax interpretations with counsel before changing distributions or custody arrangements.

What does this mean for institutional investors and market structure?

The change could lower friction for funds to offer staking exposure, thereby widening product choices for pension and asset managers. In practice, a single fund could aggregate rewards across validators while maintaining compliance with fund rules; Institutional demand may follow, though timing will vary.

However, market participants must weigh custody risk, validator counterparty issues and reporting burdens. In short, the move signals a step toward mainstreaming staking within regulated products, but practical implementation will take time and require coordination across custodians, administrators and regulators; Tether readiness will determine the pace of adoption.